RFC 2839 (rfc2839) - Page 2 of 20
Internet Kermit Service
Alternative Format: Original Text Document
RFC 2839 Internet Kermit Service May 2000 4.1.3. Plaintext Authentication via Kermit REMOTE LOGIN ........11 4.1.4. Plaintext Authentication via Command Prompt .............11 4.1.5. Anonymous Login .........................................12 4.2. ENCRYPTION (PRIVACY) ......................................12 4.2.1 Telnet Encryption .......................................12 4.2.2 Telnet Start_TLS ........................................12 5. SERVICES ....................................................13 5.1. Features for System Administrators ........................13 5.2. Features for Users ........................................14 5.3. User Interface ............................................16 6. REFERENCES ..................................................18 7. AUTHORS' ADDRESSES ..........................................19 8. Full Copyright Statement ....................................20 PREFACE This document describes an Internet Kermit Service (IKS) which provides an alternative to FTP for the transfer of files. This service is based upon both the TELNET protocol and the Kermit file transfer protocol. 1. INTRODUCTION The Internet Kermit Service: 1. Provides direct access to Kermit file transfer and management services without requiring the user to first login to a shell account; 2. Provides Kermit file transfer and management services to anonymous users; 3. Provides services to all Telnet clients that support Kermit file transfer protocol via a simple, predictable, scriptable, and well-documented textual interface; 4. Provides direct and tightly-coupled access to a Kermit server when requested via the Telnet Kermit Option [TKO]. This memo assumes knowledge of Transmission Control Protocol, the Telnet Protocol [TEL], the Kermit File Transfer Protocol [KER,PRF], Telnet Kermit Option [TKO], and the commands and features of Kermit software [CKB,CMG,K95]. The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [BCP]. da Cruz & Altman Informational



