RFC 3301 (rfc3301) - Page 2 of 19
Layer Two Tunnelling Protocol (L2TP): ATM access network extensions
Alternative Format: Original Text Document
RFC 3301 L2TP: ATM access network extensions June 2002 3.4 Framing ...................................................... 6 4. Service model issues .......................................... 7 4.1 Authentication ............................................... 7 4.2 Authorization ................................................ 7 5. New and extended AVPs ......................................... 7 5.1 New AVP Summary .............................................. 7 5.2 New AVP definition ........................................... 8 5.3 Changed AVP Definition ....................................... 12 6. IANA considerations ........................................... 16 7. Security considerations ....................................... 17 8. Acknowledgements .............................................. 17 9. References .................................................... 17 10. Authors Addresses ............................................ 18 11. Full Copyright Statement ..................................... 19 1. Introduction L2TP [RFC 2661] defines the procedures for tunneling PPP sessions between a so called L2TP Access Concentrator (LAC) and an L2TP Network Server (LNS). The main focus of [RFC 2661] is on supporting HDLC based ISDN/PSTN access networks. This document augments the procedures described in [RFC 2661] to further support ATM SVC or PVC based access networks. Support for ATM access networks requires extensions to the present L2TP procedures so as to cope with : (a) the traffic management aspects of ATM connections (e.g. asymmetric bandwidth allocation and service category selection capabilities), (b) the addressing format to be used in switched ATM networks [AESA] and (c) the limitations imposed on LCP negotiation by transporting PPP over AAL5 over the access network segment of the PPP connection [RFC 2364]. Within this document, the necessary extensions to [RFC 2661] are defined to cope with issues (a) and (b), issue (c) which is not specific to ATM may be solved as described in [L2TP_link]. 1.1 Conventions The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY" and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC 2119]. T'Joens, et al. Standards Track



